Hemorrhoids Update Review

Archive for the ‘Treatment’ Category

Barron was the first to describe hemorrhoidal banding with rubber bands in 1963.Since this original description, there have been a number of reports that have documented the efficacy banding offers for the management of the majority of patients with bleeding stage II and III internal hemorrhoids.The procedure is generally well tolerated without the need for prescription analgesia if the band is placed above the level of the dentate line. The technique is demonstrated in the picture below . It is important to ask the patient if he or she experiences any pain during placement of the bander, before deployment of the band. Discomfort immediately after band placement may be reduced by the injection of a local anesthetic agent, but this does not appear to be a long-lasting benefit. Banding is associated with the rare but frequently fatal complication of postbanding sepsis, which is heralded by the symptoms of increasing rectal pain, fever, and inability to void.It is essential to treat these symptoms early and aggressively with early antibiotic treatment coupled with surgical drainage

Options for hemorrhoidectomy include the techniques of Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy, closed Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy, Whitehead hemorrhoidectomy, and the stapled hemorrhoidectomy. The procedures are usually performed in the operating room after minimal preoperative preparation of the bowel. Lasers have no role to play in excisional hemorrhoidectomy, and in fact they cause delayed healing, increased pain, and increased cost.Anesthetic management is usually left to the anesthesiologist and patient; however, local anesthesia supplemented by the administration of intravenous narcotics and propofol is very effective. The use of spinal anesthesia, although effective, may increase the risk of postoperative urinary retention.

The Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy, which is widely practiced in Europe, was originally described in 1937, and its efficacy has been subsequently documented in many series.This technique includes resection of the entire enlarged internal hemorrhoid complex, ligation of the arterial pedicle, and preservation of the intervening anoderm.[33] The distal anoderm and external skin is left open to minimize the risk of infection in the wounds. This technique is safe and effective. However, the fact that the external wounds are left open can be a cause of considerable discomfort and prolonged morbidity.

The decision to excise the hemorrhoidal plexi requires acceptance by the physician and patient that medical and non-excisional options have either failed or are not appropriate. The usual clinical symptoms that lead to excision are frequent prolapsing of the internal hemorrhoids that results in discomfort and anal seepage. Alternatively, the thickened and prolapsing internal/external hemorrhoidal complexes may make anal hygiene difficult for the patient and may make excision preferable. The final indication for excisional hemorrhoidectomy, although debatable, is the development of acutely thrombosed and gangrenous internal hemorrhoids. It is apparent, however, that hemorrhoidectomy can be performed using standard closed hemorrhoidectomy techniques without undue complications. Specifically, the risk of stenosis appears unwarranted if careful technique is used and the maximum amount of anoderm is preserved with skin bridges between excision sites. In the case of limited external hemorrhoidal thromboses, surgical excision is warranted for more rapid pain relief and avoidance of a residual skin tag.External thromboses are usually easily managed in an office setting with local anesthesia

A, Thrombosed external hemorrhoid in the right lateral quadrant. B, Allis clamp applied to apex of thrombosis and elliptical incision made. C, Thrombosis dissected free of sphincter. D, Appearance of wound after thrombectomy.